This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Haneline, K. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

With Plan Restatement Inevitable, Keep Legal Standards of Review in Mind

Kastner Westman & Wilkins LLC

Employee benefit professionals will redraft certain benefit plan documents in the current calendar year to comply with recent changes in tax law and U.S. Department of Labor regulations. Such redrafting presents an opportunity to ensure that plan document language will invoke the most favorable judicial standard of review should the plan become the subject of a claim dispute. Generally, courts may impose one of two standards of review in deciding claim disputes. The "arbitrary and capricious" standard seeks to determine only whether the plan administrator acted within the provisions of the plan in denying a claim. The "de novo" standard gives courts greater latitude to decide disputes based on the merits of each side’s arguments. Where plan documents explicitly grant the plan administrator discretionary decision-making authority, courts will invoke the arbitrary and capricious standard of review. Benefit professionals must familiarize themselves with the issues and ensure that plan documents contain the correct language to invoke the most favorable judicial standard of review.

Compensation & Benefits Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, 50-56 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/08863680122098289


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?