Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Compensation & Benefits Review
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Ins and Outs of Non-Competes

David B. Ritter

Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg Labor & Employment Practice Group

Sonya Rosenberg

Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg Labor & Employment Practice Group

Key Words: non-compete agreement • restrictive covenant • terms of employment • non-disclosure • confidentiality clause • non-solicitation clause

References

  • Edwards v. Arthur Andersen, 142 Cal. App. 4th 603 (Ca. App. 2d Dist. 2006), review granted by 147 P. 3d 1013 (2006); see also Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.
  • Alabama Code § 8-1-1(a); North Dakota Cent. Code § 9-08-06 (except for limited circumstances, voiding non-competes).
  • North Carolina Gen. Stat. Ann. § 75-4; Georgia Code. Ann. § 13-8-2.1.
  • Palmer & Cay v. Lockton Co., 280 Ga. 479 (2006).
  • McGough v. Nalco Co., 420 F. Supp. 2d 556 (N.D. W. Va. 2006), vacated, remanded on other grounds by 2006 U.S. App. Lexis 25972 (4th Cir. 2006).
  • Litwinczuk v. Palm Beach Cardiovascular Clinic, LC, 939 So. 2d 268 (Fla. App. Ct. 4th Dist. 2006).
  • Nike, Inc. v. McCarthy, 379 F. 3d 576 (9th Cir. 2004).
  • For a detailed discussion of non-competes in termination cases, see K.J. Vanko, "You're Fired! And Don't Forget your Non-Compete...": The Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants in Involuntary Discharge Cases, 1 DePaul Bus. & Com. L.J. 1 (2002).
  • International Airport Centers v. Citrin, 440 F. 3d 418 (7th Cir. Mar. 8, 2006).

Compensation & Benefits Review, Vol. 39, No. 6, 40-46 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0886368707309017


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?