|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Compensation & Benefits Review, Vol. 23, No. 2,
24-38 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/088636879102300205
Skill-Based Pay Case Number 1: General Mills
Gerald E. Ledford, JR
Gary Bergel
General Mills adopted its pay-for-skills plan because management felt it would increase the workforce's ability to control its continuous process technology and to respond quickly to quality and production problems.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Dierdorff and E. A. Surface
If You Pay for Skills, Will They Learn? Skill Change and Maintenance Under a Skill-Based Pay System
Journal of Management,
August 1, 2008;
34(4):
721 - 743.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Levenson, W. A. Van der Stede, and S. G. Cohen
Measuring the Relationship Between Managerial Competencies and Performance
Journal of Management,
June 1, 2006;
32(3):
360 - 380.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Long and J. L. Shields
Best practice or best fit? High involvement management and base pay practices in Canadian and Australian firms
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,
April 1, 2005;
43(1):
52 - 75.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. Ledford Jr. and S. A. Mohrman
Self-Design for High Involvement: A Large-Scale Organizational Change
Human Relations,
February 1, 1993;
46(2):
143 - 173.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|