Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Compensation & Benefits Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0886368709341860v1
0886368709341860v2
0886368709341860v3
41/5/20    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin Bevilacqua, C.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pay for Performance—Panacea or Pandora’s Box? Revisiting an Old Debate in the Current Economic Environment

Christine Martin Bevilacqua

York University

Parbudyal Singh

York University

New research in neuroeconomics suggests that money may be a more powerful motivator than previously thought, with important implications for incentive pay programs.

Key Words: pay for performance • incentives • neuroeconomics • compensation design

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Compensation & Benefits Review, Vol. 41, No. 5, 20-26 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0886368709341860
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?